INTRODUCTION TO COENZYME Q10
Peter H. Langsjoen, M.D., F.A.C.C.
DEFINITION
Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) or ubiquinone is essentially a vitamin or
vitamin-like substance. Disagreements on nomenclature notwithstanding, vitamins are
defined as organic compounds essential in minute amounts for normal body function acting
as coenzymes or precursors to coenzymes. They are present naturally in foods and sometimes
are also synthesized in the body. CoQ10 likewise is found in small amounts in a wide
variety of foods and is synthesized in all tissues. The biosynthesis of CoQ10 from the
amino acid tyrosine is a multistage process requiring at least eight vitamins and several
trace elements. Coenzymes are cofactors upon which the comparatively large and complex
enzymes absolutely depend for their function. Coenzyme Q10 is the coenzyme for at least
three mitochondrial enzymes (complexes I, II and III) as well as enzymes in other parts of
the cell. Mitochondrial enzymes of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway are essential for
the production of the high-energy phosphate, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), upon which all
cellular functions depend. The electron and proton transfer functions of the quinone ring
are of fundamental importance to all life forms; ubiquinone in the mitochondria of
animals, plastoquinone in the chloroplast of plants, and menaquinone in bacteria. The term
"bioenergetics" has been used to describe the field of biochemistry looking
specifically at cellular energy production. In the related field of free radical
chemistry, CoQ10 has been studied in its reduced form as a potent antioxidant. The
bioenergetics and free radical chemistry of CoQ10 are reviewed in Gian Paolo Littarru's
book, Energy and Defense, published in 1994 (1).
HISTORY
CoQ10 was first isolated from beef heart mitochondria by Dr. Frederick
Crane of Wisconsin, U.S.A., in 1957 (2). The same year, Professor Morton of England
defined a compound obtained from vitamin A deficient rat liver to be the same as CoQ10
(3). Professor Morton introduced the name ubiquinone, meaning the ubiquitous quinone. In
1958, Professor Karl Folkers and co-workers at Merck, Inc., determined the precise
chemical structure of CoQ10: 2,3 dimethoxy-5 methyl-6 decaprenyl benzoquinone, synthesized
it, and were the first to produce it by fermentation. In the mid-1960's, Professor
Yamamura of Japan became the first in the world to use coenzyme Q7 (a related compound) in
the treatment of human disease: congestive heart failure. In 1966, Mellors and Tappel
showed that reduced CoQ6 was an effective antioxidant (4,5). In 1972 Gian Paolo Littarru
of Italy along with Professor Karl Folkers documented a deficiency of CoQ10 in human heart
disease (6). By the mid-1970's, the Japanese perfected the industrial technology to
produce pure CoQ10 in quantities sufficient for larger clinical trials. Peter Mitchell
received the Nobel Prize in 1978 for his contribution to the understanding of biological
energy transfer through the formulation of the chemiosmotic theory, which includes the
vital protonmotive role of CoQ10 in energy transfer systems (7,8,9,10).
In the early 1980's, there was a considerable acceleration in the number and size of
clinical trials. These resulted in part from the availability of pure CoQ10 in large
quantities from pharmaceutical companies in Japan and from the capacity to directly
measure CoQ10 in blood and tissue by high performance liquid chromatography. Lars Ernster
of Sweden enlarged upon CoQ10's importance as an antioxidant and free radical scavenger
(11). Professor Karl Folkers went on to receive the Priestly Medal from the American
Chemical Society in 1986 and the National Medal of Science from President Bush in 1990 for
his work with CoQ10 and other vitamins.
COENZYME Q10 DEFICIENCY
Normal blood and tissue levels of CoQ10 have been well established by
numerous investigators around the world. Significantly decreased levels of CoQ10 have been
noted in a wide variety of diseases in both animal and human studies. CoQ10 deficiency may
be caused by insufficient dietary CoQ10 impairment in CoQ10 biosynthesis, excessive
utilization of CoQ10 by the body, or any combination of the three. Decreased dietary
intake is presumed in chronic malnutrition and cachexia (12). The relative contribution of
CoQ10 biosynthesis versus dietary CoQ10 is under investigation. Karl Folkers takes the
position that the dominant source of CoQ10 in man is biosynthesis. This complex, 17 step
process, requiring at least seven vitamins (vitamin B2 - riboflavin, vitamin B3
niacinamide, vitamin B6, folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin C, and pantothenic acid) and
several trace elements, is, by its nature highly vulnerable. Karl Folkers argues that
suboptimal nutrient intake in man is almost universal and that there is subsequent
secondary impairment in CoQ10 biosynthesis. This would mean that average or
"normal" levels of CoQ10 are really suboptimal and the very low levels observed
in advanced disease states represent only the tip of a deficiency "ice berg".
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors used to treat elevated blood cholesterol levels by blocking
cholesterol biosynthesis also block CoQ10 biosynthesis (13). The resulting lowering of
blood CoQ10 level is due to the partially shared biosynthetic pathway of CoQ10 and
cholesterol. In patients with heart failure this is more than a laboratory observation. It
has a significant harmful effect which can be negated by oral CoQ10 supplementation (14).
Increased body consumption of CoQ10 is the presumed cause of low blood CoQ10 levels seen
in excessive exertion, hypermetabolism, and acute shock states. It is likely that all
three mechanisms (insufficient dietary CoQ10, impaired CoQ10 biosynthesis, and excessive
utilization of CoQ10) are operable to varying degrees in most cases of observed CoQ10
deficiency.
TREATMENT OF HEART DISEASE WITH COENZYME Q10
CoQ10 is known to be highly concentrated in heart muscle cells due to the
high energy requirements of this cell type. For the past 14 years, the great bulk of
clinical work with CoQ10 has focused on heart disease. Specifically, congestive heart
failure (from a wide variety of causes) has been strongly correlated with significantly
low blood and tissue levels of CoQ10 (15). The severity of heart failure correlates with
the severity of CoQ10 deficiency (16). This CoQ10 deficiency may well be a primary
etiologic factor in some types of heart muscle dysfunction while in others it may be a
secondary phenomenon. Whether primary, secondary or both, this deficiency of CoQ10 appears
to be a major treatable factor in the otherwise inexorable progression of heart failure.
Pioneering trials of CoQ10 in heart failure involved primarily patients with dilated weak
heart muscle of unknown cause (idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy). CoQ10 was added to
standard treatments for heart failure such as fluid pills (diuretics), digitalis
preparations (Lanoxin), and ACE inhibitors. Several trials involved the comparison between
supplemental CoQ10 and placebo on heart function as measured by echocardiography. CoQ10
was given orally in divided doses as a dry tablet chewed with a fat containing food or an
oil-based gel cap swallowed at mealtime. Heart function, as indicated by the fraction of
blood pumped out of the heart with each beat (the ejection fraction), showed a gradual and
sustained improvement in tempo with a gradual and sustained improved in patients' symptoms
of fatigue, dyspnea, chest pain, and palpitations. The degree of improvement was
occasionally dramatic with some patients developing a normal heart size and function on
CoQ10 alone. Most of these dramatic cases were patients who began CoQ10 shortly after the
onset of congestive heart failure. Patients with more established disease frequently
showed clear improvement but not a return to normal heart size and function.
Internationally, there have been at least nine placebo controlled studies on the treatment
of heart disease with CoQ10: two in Japan, two in the United States, two in Italy, two in
Germany, and one in Sweden (17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25). All nine of these studies have
confirmed the effectiveness of CoQ10 as well as its remarkable safety. There have now been
eight international symposia on the biomedical and clinical aspects of CoQ10 (from 1976
through 1993 (26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33)). These eight symposia comprised over 300 papers
presented by approximately 200 different physicians and scientists from 18 different
countries. The majority of these scientific papers were Japanese, 34 percent, with
American, 26 percent, Italian, 20 percent and the remaining 20 percent from Sweden,
Denmark, Germany, United Kingdom, Belgium, Australia, Austria, France, India, Korea,
Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland, USSR, and Finland. The majority of the clinical studies
concerned the treatment of heart disease and were remarkably consistent in their
conclusions: that treatment with CoQ10 significantly improved heart muscle function while
producing no adverse effects or drug interactions.
It should be mentioned that a slight decrease in the effectiveness of the blood thinner,
coumadin, was noted in a case by a Norwegian clinician (34). This possible drug - CoQ10
interaction has not been observed by other investigators even when using much higher doses
of CoQ10 for up to seven years and involving 25 patients treated with coumadin
concomitantly with CoQ10 (this is still, as of this date, unpublished data). The efficacy
and safety of CoQ10 in the treatment of congestive heart failure, whether related to
primary cardiomyopathies or secondary forms of heart failure, appears to be well
established. The largest study to date is the Italian multicenter trial, by Baggio et al.,
involving 2664 patients with heart failure.
The most recent work in heart failure examined the effect of CoQ10 on diastolic
dysfunction, one of the earliest identifiable signs of myocardial failure that is often
found in mitral valve prolapse, hypertensive heart disease and certain fatigue syndromes.
Diastolic dysfunction might be considered the common denominator and a basic cause of
symptoms in these three diagnostic groups of disease. Diastole is the filling phase of the
cardiac cycle. Diastolic function has a larger cellular energy requirement than the
systolic contraction and, therefore, the process of diastolic relaxation is more highly
energy dependent and thus more highly dependent on CoQ10. In simpler terms, it takes more
energy to fill the heart than to empty it. Diastolic dysfunction is a
"stiffening" of the heart muscle which interferes with the heart's ability to
function as an effective pump. It is seen early in the course of many common cardiac
disorders and is demonstrable by echocardiography. This stiffening returns towards normal
with supplemental CoQ10 in tempo with clinical improvement.
It is important to note that in all of the above clinical trials, CoQ10 was used in
addition to traditional medical treatments, not to their exclusion. In one study by
Langsjoen et al, of 109 patients with essential hypertensions, 51 percent were able to
stop between one and three anti-hypersensitive drugs at an average of 4.4 months after
starting CoQ10 treatment while the overall New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional
class improved significantly from a mean of 2.40 to 1.36. Hypertension is reduced when
diastolic function improves. In another study there was a gradual and sustained decrease
in dosage or discontinuation of concomitant cardiovascular drug therapy: Of 424 patients
with cardiovascular disease, 43 percent were able to stop between one and three
cardiovascular drugs with CoQ10 therapy. The authors conclude that the vitamin-like
substance, CoQ10 "may be ushering in the new era of cellular/biochemical treatment of
disease, complementing and extending the systems-oriented, macro and microscopic approach
that has served us well to this point".
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Over the past several years, there has been a steady increase in public
interest and awareness of nutritional supplements and vitamins. Along with this
accelerated interest has come an understandable explosion in the number and complexity of
questions raised by patients about vitamins in general. By and large, these questions are
quite difficult to answer. I personally am frequently asked the following questions:
1. What is CoQ10?
It is a fat-soluble vitamin-like substance present in every cell of the body and serves as
a coenzyme for several of the key enzymatic steps in the production of energy within the
cell. It also functions as an antioxidant which is important in its clinical effects. It
is naturally present in small amounts in a wide variety of foods but is particularly high
in organ meats such as heart, liver and kidney, as well as beef, soy oil, sardines,
mackerel, and peanuts. To put dietary CoQ10 intake into perspective, one pound of
sardines, two pounds of beef, or two and one half pounds of peanuts, provide 30 mg of
CoQ10. CoQ10 is also synthesized in all tissues and in healthy individuals normal levels
are maintained both by CoQ10 intake and by the body's synthesis of CoQ10. It has no known
toxicity or side effects.
2. Should I take CoQ10?
This question can be asked in two ways. First, should a reasonably healthy person take
CoQ10 to stay healthy or to become more robust? At present I do not believe anyone knows
the answer to this question. Second, should a person with an illness such as congestive
heart failure take CoQ10? As with any change in nutrition, diet, medication, or even
activity, CoQ10 should be discussed with one's physician. As improvement in heart function
occurs, a patient should have regular medical follow up with particular attention to
concomitant drug therapy. The attached references will provide detailed information on the
clinical use of CoQ10 and can be obtained from any good medical library.
3. What is the dosage of CoQ10?
The dosage of CoQ10 used in clinical trials has evolved over the past 20 years. Initially,
doses as small as 30 to 45 mg per day were associated with measurable clinical responses
in patients with heart failure. More recent studies have used higher doses with improved
clinical response, again in patients with heart failure. Most studies with CoQ10 involve
the measurement of the level of CoQ10 in blood. CoQ10 shows a moderate variability in its
absorption, with some patients attaining good blood levels of CoQ10 on 100 mg per day
while others require two or three times this amount to attain the same blood level. All
CoQ10 available today in the United States is manufactured in Japan and is distributed by
a number of companies who place the CoQ10 either in pressed tablets, powder-filled
capsules, or oil-based gelcaps. CoQ10 is fat-soluble and absorption is significantly
improved when it is chewed with a fat-containing food. Published data on the dosage of
CoQ10 relates almost exclusively to the treatment of disease states. There is no
information on the use of CoQ10 for prevention of illness. This is an extremely important
question which, to date, does not have an answer.
4. If CoQ10 is so effective in the treatment of heart failure, why is it not more
generally used in this country?
The answer to this question is found in the fields of politics and marketing and not in
the fields of science or medicine. The controversy surrounding CoQ10 likewise is political
and economic as the previous 30 years of research on CoQ10 have been remarkably consistent
and free of major controversy. Although it is not the first time that a fundamental and
clinically important discovery has come about without the backing of a pharmaceutical
company, it is the first such discovery to so radically alter how we as physicians must
view disease. While the pharmaceutical industry does a good job at physician and patient
education on their new products, the distributors of CoQ10 are not as effective at this.
This education is very costly and can only be done with the reasonable expectation of
patent protected profit. CoQ10 is not patentable. The discovery of CoQ10 was based
primarily on support from the National Heart Institute of NIH (National Institute of
Health) at the Institute for Enzyme Research, University of Wisconsin.
THE FUTURE OF COENZYME Q10
In the past 50 years the driving force in medicine has been the
development of drugs and procedures to modify the pathophysiology of illness. As viewed
from the trenches of medical practice, the advances in drug therapy, although notable and
clearly helpful appear to have reached a plateau. Most of the "new" drugs over
the past several years are primarily variants of old drugs. By comparison, the impressive
advances made by basic scientists, biochemists and molecular biologists, are only now
beginning to be appreciated by the medical profession, and the enormous potential of these
basic science advances has yet to be pursued.
Modern medicine seems to be based on an "attack strategy", a philosophy of
treatment formed in response to the discovery of antibiotics and the development of
surgical/anaesthetic techniques. Disease is viewed as something that can be attacked
selectively - with antibiotics, chemotherapy, or surgery - assuming no harm to the host.
Even chronic illnesses, such as diabetes and hypertension, yield simple numbers which can
be furiously assaulted with medications. Amidst the miracles and drama of 20th century
medicine we may have forgotten the importance of host support, as if time borrowed with
medications and surgery were restorative in and of itself. Yet, in this age, a patient may
be cured of leukaemia through multiple courses of chemotherapy and bone marrow
transplantation, only to die slowly of unrecognized thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency. Like
the vitamins discovered in the early part of this century, CoQ10 is an essential element
of food that can now be used medicinally to support the sick host in conditions where
nutritional depletion and cellular dysfunction occur. Surely, the combination of disease
attacking strategy and host supportive treatments would yield much better results in
clinical medicine.
Since CoQ10 is essential to the optimal function of all cell types, it is not surprising
to find a seemingly diverse number of disease states which respond favourably to CoQ10
supplementation. All metabolically active tissues are highly sensitive to a deficiency of
CoQ10. CoQ10's function as a free radical scavenger only adds to the protean
manifestations of COQ10 deficiency. Preliminary observations in a wide variety of disease
states have already been published.
One of the disease states which has received attention is cancer. Low levels of CoQ10 in
the blood of some cancer patients have been noted, but overall, there is little data
regarding cancer. The best work to date documents a significant reduction in the cardiac
toxicity of the chemotherapy drug, Adriamycin. The cardiac toxicity of Adriamycin and
related drugs may well relate to free radical generation and this might explain the
benefit of CoQ10 in its capacity as a free radical scavenger. The studies on Adriamycin
cardiotoxicity were of short duration and did not specifically note any favourable or
detrimental effect on the clinical course of the cancer itself. It is reasonable to assume
that optimal nutrition (which would include optimal levels of CoQ10) is generally
beneficial in any disease state, including cancer.
Another interesting topic is the relationship between the immune system and CoQ10. Immune
function is extraordinarily complex and undoubtedly is influenced by numerous nutritional
variables. There are some encouraging preliminary data from the study of AIDS patients.
End stage AIDS, like other overwhelming illnesses, has been associated with a significant
deficiency in CoQ10. Regarding AIDS and cancer, it would be foolish to make premature
statements about future utility of CoQ10, but it is oven more foolish to ignore the
importance of adequate CoQ10 levels in these disease states. Adequate CoQ10
supplementation (with close attention to plasma CoQ10 levels) is analogous to adequate
hydration, and any treatment of critically ill patients should not ignore this easily
measured and correctable deficiency.
The antioxidant or free radical quenching properties of CoQ10 serve to greatly reduce
oxidative damage to tissues as well as significantly inhibit the oxidation of LDL
cholesterol (much more efficiently than vitamin E). This has great implications in the
treatment of ischemia and reperfusion injury as well as the potential for slowing the
development of atherosclerosis. In keeping with the free radical theory of ageing, these
antioxidant properties of CoQ10 have clear implications in the slowing of ageing and age
related degenerative diseases. There is epidemiologic evidence in humans that uniformly
shows a gradual decline in CoQ10 levels after the age of twenty.
Until recently, attention has been focused on requirements for CoQ10 in energy conversion
in the mitochondrial compartment of cells or on the antioxidant properties of CoQ10. New
evidence shows that CoQ10 is present in other cell membranes. In the outer membrane it may
contribute to the control of cell growth, especially in lymphocytes (the implications are
far reaching). The clinical experience with CoQ10 in heart failure is nothing short of
dramatic, and it is reasonable to believe that the entire field of medicine should be
re-evaluated in light of this growing knowledge. We have only scratched the surface of the
biomedical and clinical applications of CoQ10 and the associated fields of bioenergetics
and free radical chemistry.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sincere appreciation is expressed to Hans Langsjoen of the University of
Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Karl Folkers and Richard Willis of the University of
Texas at Austin, Frederick Crane of Purdue University in Indiana. Lars Ernster of the
Stockholm University, Sweden, Gian Paolo Littarru of the Universitv of Ancona Medical
School, Italy, and my wife Alena Langsjoen for their help in the completion of this
manuscript.
Peter H. Langsjoen, M.D., F.A.C.C., P.A.
1120 Medical Dr.
Tyler, TX 75701
Permission is granted to reproduce this material for noncommercial use
provided that the text, author's name, and copyright statement are not changed in any way.
REFERENCES
1. Gian Paolo Littarru (1994) Energy and Defense. Facts and perspectives on Coenzyme Q10
in biology and medicine. Casa Editrice Scientifica Internazionale, pp 1-91.
2. Crane F.L., Hatefi Y., Lester R.I., Widmer C.(1957) Isolation of a quinone from beef
beart mitochondria. Biochimica et Biophys. Acta, vol.25, pp.220-221.
3. Morton R.A., Wilson G.M., Lowe J.S., Leat W.M.F. (1957) Ubiquinone. Chemical Industry,
pp.1649.
4. Mellors A., Tappel A.L. (1966) Quinones and quinols as inhibitors of lipid
peroxidation. Lipids, vol. 1, pp.282-284.
5. Mellors A., Tappel A.L. (1966) The inhibition of mitochondrial peroxidation by
ubiquinone and ubiquinol. J Biol. Chem., vol. 241, pp.4353-4356.
6. Littarru G.P., Hol., Folkers K. (1972) Deficiency of Coenzyme Q10 in human heart
disease. Part I and II. Internat. J Vit. Nutr. Res., 42, n.2, 291:42, n. 3:413.
7. Mitchell P. (1976) Possible molecular mechanisms of the protonmotive function of
cytochrome systems. J. Theoret. Biol., vol. 62, pp.327-367.
8. Mitchell P. (1991) The vital protonmotive role of coenzyme Q. Folkers K., Littarru
G.P., Yamagami T. (eds) Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 6, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, pp.310.
9. Mitchell P. (1988) Respiratory chain systems in theory and practice. Advances in
Membrane Biochemistry and Bioenergetics, Kim C.H., et al. (eds), Plenum Press, New York,
pp.25-52.
10. Mitchell P. (1979) Kelin's respiratory chain concept and its chemiosmotic
consequences. Science, vol. 206, pp.1148-1159.
11. Ernster L., Forsmark-Andree (1993) Ubiquinol: an endogenous antioxidant in aerobic
organisms. Seventh International Symposium on Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme
Q Folkers K., Mortensen S.A., Littarru G.P., Yamagami T., and Lenaz, G. (eds) The Clinical
Investigator, Supplement to Vol.71 Issue 8, pp.S60-S65.
12. Littarru G.P., Lippa S., Oradei A., Fiorni R.M., Mazzanti L. Metabolic and diagnostic
implications of blood CoQ10 levels. In: Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q,
vol. 6 (1991) Folkers K., Yamagami T., and Littarru G.P. (eds)Elsevier, Amsterdam,
pp.1-555.
13. Ghirlanda G., Oradei A., Manto A., Lippa S., Uccioli L., Caputo S., Greco A.V.,
Littarru G.P. (1993) Evidence of Plasma CoQ10 - Lowering Effect by HMG-CoA Reductase
Inhibitors: A double blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin.Pharmocol., J. 33, 3, 226-229.
14. Folkers K., Langsjoen Per H., Willis R., Richardson P., Xia L., Ye C., Tamagawa H.
(1990) Lovastatin decreases coenzyme Q levels in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. Vol. 87,
pp.8931-8934.
15. Folkers K., Vadhanavikit S., Mortensen S.A. (1985) Biochemical rationale and
myocardial tissue data on the effective therapy of cardiomyopathy with coenzyme Q10. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., vol.82(3), pp.901-904.
16. Mortensen S.A., Vadhanavikit S., Folkers K. (1984) Deficiency of coenzyme Q10 in
myocardial failure. Drugs Exptl. Clin. Res. X(7) 497-502.
17. Hiasa Y., Ishida T., Maeda T., Iwanc K., Aihara T., and Mori H. Effects of coenzyme
Ql0 on exercise tolerance in patients with stable angina pectoris. Biomedical and Clinical
Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol.4 (1984) Folkers K., Yamamura Y., (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam,
pp.291-301.
18. Kamikawa T., Kobayashi A., Yamashita T., Hayashi H., and Yamazaki N. (1985) Effects of
coenzyme Ql0 on exercise tolerance in chronic stable angina pectoris. Am. J. Cardiol.,
56:247-251.
19. Langsjoen P.H., Vadhanavikit S., Folkers K (1985) Response of patients in classes III
and IV of cardiomyopathy to therapy in a blind and crossover trial with coenzyme Ql0.
Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sci., U.S.A., vol. 82, pp.4240-4244.
20. Judy W.V., Hall J.H., Toth P.D., Folkers K. (1986) Double blind-double crossover study
of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure. Folkers K., Yamamura Y. (eds) Biomedical and clinical
aspects of coenzyme Q, vol.5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.315-323.
21. Rossi E., Lombardo A., Testa M., Lippa S., Oradei A., Littarru G.P., Lucente M.,
Coppola E., Manzoli U. (1991) Coenzyme Q10 in ischaemic cardiopathy. Biomedical and
Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 6 Folkers K., Yamagami T., and Littarru G.P. (eds)
Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.321-326.
22. Morisco C., Trimarco B., Condorelli M.(1993) Effect of coenzyme Q10 therapy in
patients with congestive heart failure: A long-term multicenter randomized study. Seventh
International Symposium on Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q Folkers K.,
Mortensen S.A.. Littarru G.P., Yamagami T., and Lenaz G. (eds) The Clinical Investigator,
71:S134-S136.
23. Schneeberger W., Muller-Steinwachs J., Anda L.P., Fuchs W., Zilliken F., Lyson K.,
Muratsu K., and Folkers K. (1986) A clinical double blind and crossover trial with
coenzyme Ql0 on patients with cardiac disease. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme
Q, vol. 5 Folkers K., Yamamura Y. (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.325-333.
24. Schardt F., Welzel D., Schiess W., and Toda K. (1991) Effect of Coenzyme Q10 on
ischaemia-induced ST-segment depression: A double blind, placebo-controlled crossover
study. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 6 Folkers K., Yamagami T., and
Littarru G.P. (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.385-403.
25. Swedberg K., Hoffman-Berg C., Rehnqvist N., Astrom H. (1992) Coenzyme Q10 as an
adjunctive in treatment of congestive heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., pp.774-776.
26. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q. (1977) Folkers K., Yamamura Y. (eds)
Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.1-315.
27. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 2 (1980) Yamamura Y., Folkers K.,
and Ito Y. (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1-456.
28. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 3 (1981) Folkers K., Yamamura Y.,
(eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.1-414.
29. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 4 (1984) Folkers K., Yamamura Y.,
(eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.1-432.
30. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 5 (1986) Folkers K., Yamamura Y.,
(eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.1-410.
31. Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q, vol. 6 (1991) Folkers K., Yamagami T.,
and Littarru G.P. (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.1-555.
32. Seventh International Symposium on Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q
(1993) Folkers K., Mortensen S.A., Littarru G.P., Yamagami T., and Lenaz G. (eds) The
Clinical Investigator, Supplement to Vol.71 Issue 8, pp.S51-S177.
33. Eighth International Symposium on Biomedical and Clinical Aspects of Coenzyme Q (1994)
The Molecular Aspects of Medicine, in print.
34. Spigset O. (1994) Reduced effect of warfarin caused by ubidecarenone. Lancet Nov.12
Vol.344, pp.8933. |